三星Galaxy Z Fold5 评测--向最佳可折叠智能手机迈出的一小步？再一看，最好的可折叠智能手机是什么？ 从设计和技术角度来看，Galaxy Z Fold5 从 Fold4 中汲取了灵感。虽然三星最新推出的可折叠智能手机仅在部分领域有所改进，但Galaxy Fold5 在折叠系列所熟悉的优点上还是大放异彩。请阅读这里，了解它是否值得购买。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/28/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇸🇪 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇷🇺 5G Android Foldable Smartphone
在其Galaxy Unpacked Event上发布了第五代 XXL 可折叠手机。Z Fold4Galaxy Z Fold4的继任者是迄今为止Galaxy Z 系列中最薄、最轻的折叠手机。不过，你必须仔细观察才能发现这两款智能手机的不同之处。主屏幕仍然是 7.6 英寸，宽高比为 21.6:18，正面显示屏为 6.2 英寸，宽高比为 23.1:9。新的柔性铰链使 Fold5 几乎可以完全折叠，没有大的缝隙，这是最明显的创新。
除此之外，其骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy相比，Galaxy Z Fold5 提供了更高的效率和性能。 高通 SoC更高的效率和性能。可折叠系列的基本概念和设计没有任何调整。此外，安装的摄像头与 Fold4 的设置没有区别，最多只是受益于新的 Snapdragon ISP。
Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Galaxy Z Fold Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 740Memory12 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay7.60 inch 10.8:9, 2176 x 1812 pixel 373 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen , native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED, Cover display: 6.2 inch; 2316 x 904; 23.1:9, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB , 222 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, MiracastNetworkingWi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78),, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 6.1 x 154.9 x 129.9Battery4400 mAh Lithium-IonChargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 13CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, 23 mm, 1.0 µm) + 10 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, OIS, 66 mm, 1.0 µm) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, 12 mm, 1.12 µm, wide angle lens), camera2API: Level 3Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2) + 4 MPix (Under Display Camera, f/1.8)Additional featuresSpeakers: stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, info material, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 1.244W/kg Head, 1.193W/kg Body, GNSS: GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1+B2), Galileo (E1+E5), fanless, waterproofWeight253 g
Price1899 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionPrice
89.1 %v7 (old)08 / 2023Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740253 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2176x1812
89.8 %v7 (old)10 / 2022Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GSD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730263 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2176x1812
84.7 %v7 (old)08 / 2023Google Pixel FoldTensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7283 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2208x1840
86.3 %v7 (old)06 / 2023Huawei Mate X3SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.85"2496x2224
91.1 %v7 (old)03 / 2023Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraSD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740233 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3080x1440
案例 - 改进了 UDC 的三星Galaxy Z Fold5
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Galaxy 折叠 5 种颜色可供选择Galaxy Z Fold5 有幻影黑、冰蓝和奶油三种颜色，以及三星在线商店独有的蓝色和灰色。Galaxy Z Fold5 打开后的机身宽度为 6.1 毫米，仅比上一代产品纤薄 0.2 毫米。尽管如此，由于采用了新开发的铰链设计，没有了 Fold4 和 Fold5 的缝隙，最新的 Fold 新机给人的感觉明显更薄。折叠 4.不过，Galaxy Z Fold5 厚度超过 13 毫米，显然比 11 毫米厚的华为 Mate X3 厚。华为 Mate X3或 10 毫米厚的Honor Magic V2。.
与Honor 的可折叠竞争产品相比，Fold5 仍有一个很大的优势，那就是外壳通过了官方 IPX8 认证。当设备持续浸没在 1.5 米深的水中长达 30 分钟时，它仍能提供保护。除了 IPX8 防护等级外，这家韩国制造商还提升了其 Foldable 的韧性，Fold5 的主显示屏覆盖了一层减震层，前后显示屏均受到康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 的保护。此外，可自由调节的 Flex 铰链的双轨结构据说能更成功地吸收颠簸。除此之外，还有我们熟悉的 Armor 铝边框。
其制造质量达到了很高的水平，与 折叠式 4相比，铰链和玻璃元件之间的角度过渡有了明显改善。Galaxy Fold5 的屏下摄像头（UDC）现在比我们在上一代机型上看到的显示矩阵拥有更多的子像素，但仔细观察，马赛克图案依然清晰可见。不过，即使在白色背景下，UDC 及其变薄的子像素也不再那么令人困扰。
尺寸比较
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Google Pixel Fold Huawei Mate X3 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 DIN A6 ❌
功能 - 配备 1 TB 选件的三星智能手机Galaxy Z Fold5 有以下三个版本，配备蓝牙 5.3、NFC、UWB 芯片和 Miracast，可提供多种功能选择：
Galaxy Z Fold5| 12 GB LPDDR5x 内存| 256 GB UFS 4.0 存储| 1799 美元（建议零售价）
Galaxy Z Fold5| 12 GB LPDDR5x 内存| 512 GB UFS 4.0 存储| 1,919 美元（建议零售价）
Galaxy Z Fold5| 12 GB LPDDR5x RAM| 1 TB UFS 4.0 存储| 2,159 美元（建议零售价）--在三星网上商店独家销售。
这家韩国制造商的可折叠设备采用快速 USB 3.2（Gen.1）标准，除了通过 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口进行有线视频输出外，还提供 USB OTG 功能。在我们使用连接的 M2.SSD 硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的拷贝测试中，USB 端口的传输速度达到了 214 MB/s。此外，还支持三星 DeX 的桌面模式，可通过无线或可选线缆使用。
软件 - 三星Galaxy Z Fold5 的长期更新三星Galaxy Z Fold5 搭载了谷歌Android 13 和自家的 One UI 5.1.1。除了注重多任务处理外，还有一个应用程序栏，现在可以在显示屏上同时打开三个应用程序。
在测试期间，三星可折叠手机的操作系统基于2023年7月的安全补丁，并承诺更新至2028年。Galaxy 手机将获得四代的操作系统更新，直至Android 17。长期的软件更新支持是Galaxy Z Fold5 的一大亮点，没有其他可折叠手机能提供更多的支持，甚至连谷歌 Pixel 折叠手机.
通信与全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy 智能手机配备 5G使用 WiFi 6E，三星可以提供很高的传输速度，不过，市场上已经有支持当前 WiFi 7 标准的智能手机。使用我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，Galaxy Z Fold5 在 6 GHz 频率范围内的传输速度约为 1,600 MBit/s，在 5 GHz 频率范围内的传输速度约为 900 MBit/s。高传输速度也基本稳定。此外，Galaxy Z Fold5 支持目前所有的移动通信标准，包括 5G Sub6（5G mmWave 除外）。频率覆盖范围也很广。
NetworkingSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000
886 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
924 (min: 456) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1631 (min: 1075) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1601 (min: 1511) MBit/s ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000
882 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 455) MBit/s ∼55%
Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
950 (min: 481) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1714 (min: 856) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1684 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000
928 (min: 851) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
934 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash iperf3 receive AXE11000
1496 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1671 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1754 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1504 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 receive AXE11000
737 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1392 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1407 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1075-1812) Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1686 (856-1766) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1598 (1511-1667) Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1447-1788) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø884 (764-954) Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (888-932) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (456-950) Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (481-980)
室外地点
室内地点为了评估实际情况下的定位精度，我们带着这款可折叠智能手机进行了一次短途旅行。为了进行比较，我们同时用 Garmin Venu 2 记录了路线。在 GPS 测试中，我们对Galaxy Z Fold5 的定位精度并不完全满意。在我们转弯的地方，三星智能手机的卫星连接似乎出现了问题，这意味着在详细分析中可以看到与所选路线的明显偏差。
Garmin Venu 2 vs.Galaxy Z Fold5
电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy Z Fold5 配备 eSIM 卡Galaxy Z Fold5 支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，还支持双卡双待功能，可使用两张 Nano SIM 卡，或者也可以激活 eSIM 卡。语音质量非常好，声音还原清晰。我们的通话者也用清晰来形容三星智能手机的语音传输。
摄像头 - 三摄像头三星智能手机使用 4 MP UDC 自拍
使用 1000 万像素前置摄像头自拍三星再次将 400 万像素屏下摄像头隐藏在主显示屏下。在多帧合成技术和人工智能算法的帮助下，制造商的目标是提高图像的清晰度。根据Galaxy Z Fold5 的测试照片，我们也可以证实这一点。不过，外置的 1000 万像素打孔摄像头显然仍能提供更均衡的效果。不过，如果手边有合适的位置，可以将设备翻开，使用主摄像头和前面板作为取景器。
不变的折叠45000 万像素主摄像头给我们留下了良好的动态效果和清晰度。Galaxy Z Fold 在测试照片和可控光照条件下都成功地再现了色彩，尽管绿色色调有点过于耀眼。
超广角镜头和 1000 万像素 OIS 远摄摄像头坚如磐石，但 3 倍以上的变焦水平并没有给我们留下深刻印象。1200 万像素摄像头在拍摄超广角照片时表现更好。在这方面，细节保留得更好。
超广角
广角
3 倍变焦
5 倍变焦
10 倍变焦
30 倍变焦（最大值）
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Google Pixel FoldApple iPhone 14 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Google Pixel FoldApple iPhone 14 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Google Pixel FoldApple iPhone 14 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Google Pixel FoldApple iPhone 14 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Google Pixel FoldApple iPhone 14 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
9.6 ∆E5 ∆E9.4 ∆E12.8 ∆E7.2 ∆E4.4 ∆E7 ∆E10.2 ∆E8.4 ∆E4.6 ∆E4.7 ∆E8.1 ∆E6.9 ∆E9.9 ∆E9.4 ∆E2.8 ∆E6.5 ∆E11.7 ∆E6.3 ∆E2.4 ∆E5 ∆E3.9 ∆E1.5 ∆E4.2 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: 6.74 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 12.83 ∆E7.3 ∆E8.1 ∆E2.2 ∆E5.1 ∆E3.8 ∆E6.8 ∆E2.7 ∆E1.6 ∆E6.6 ∆E5.9 ∆E4.3 ∆E5.7 ∆E5.9 ∆E3.3 ∆E3.9 ∆E3 ∆E6.5 ∆E12.9 ∆E5.8 ∆E3.6 ∆E4.1 ∆E8.7 ∆E13.9 ∆E13.8 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: 6.06 ∆E min: 1.6 - max: 13.88 ∆E
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
配件和保修 -Galaxy Z Fold5 不含充电器可选Galaxy Z Fold5 保护套开箱后，Galaxy Z Fold5 没有配备充电器，但随附了数据线或充电线（USB-C 至 USB-C）和 SIM 卡工具。三星还提供了大量可选的配套保护套，包括超薄 S Pen 保护套、透明 Gadget 保护套、生态皮革保护套以及带绑带的站立式保护套。
在德国，三星为手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。此外，购买 Fold5 还可享受一年的 Care+ 服务。
输入设备和操作 - S Pen 三星智能手机虽然外层 6.2 英寸 OLED 面板受到康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 的保护，但 Fold5 的内部显示屏及其可折叠玻璃材料仍然覆盖着一层永久性保护膜。两块显示屏反应灵敏。全新的铰链设计支持 75° 至 115° 角度的弯曲模式，看起来非常稳固。
就像 Fold4的前身一样，指纹传感器内置于开机键中，解锁三星手机非常可靠。相当不安全的 2D 人脸识别功能使用前置摄像头和显示屏下摄像头来实现 FaceUnlock 功能，在日常使用中也同样可靠。
与 Galaxy S23 Ultra不同的是，这款可折叠智能手机的折叠版没有为 S Pen 预留空间。遗憾的是，三星也没有在外侧显示屏上提供手写笔支持，用户在日常使用中可能会觉得很烦。
▶ load Youtube video
显示屏 -Galaxy Z Fold5 采用可折叠 OLED 显示屏。外部面板子像素图像
内部面板子像素图像
显示褶皱Fold5 的亮点是 7.6 英寸柔性动态 AMOLED 面板，动态刷新率为 1 至 120 Hz，在我们的测试中达到了 1,674 cd/m² 的峰值亮度（APL18）。不过，我们测得的亮度比前代产品高出约 200 cd/m²。 前代产品即使在角到角完全为白色的显示屏上也是如此。折叠区域的折痕仍然清晰可见，但比 Fold4 的折痕稍显平淡。
在亮度方面，高大的 6.2 英寸前面板的刷新率从 48 Hz 到 120 Hz 不等，与主屏幕的亮度值不相匹配。我们测得的最大亮度为 957 cd/m²，与 Fold4 几乎相同。 Fold4.
由于采用了 OLED 技术，Fold5 无法避免 PWM 闪烁。在低亮度下（< 45%），这种闪烁以 120 Hz 的频率持续发生，如果亮度增加，则以 240 Hz 的频率持续发生。
1101cd/m²1093cd/m²1110cd/m²1114cd/m²1104cd/m²1099cd/m²1112cd/m²1123cd/m²1108cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3 - Foldable ScreenMaximum: 1123 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1107.1 cd/m² Minimum: 0.92 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %Center on Battery: 1104 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.01CCT: 6594 K
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6"Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Dynamic AMOLED, 2316x904, 6.2"Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GDynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6"Google Pixel FoldOLED, 2208x1840, 7.6"Huawei Mate X3OLED, 2496x2224, 7.9"Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraDynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.8"Screen6%13%14%18%10%Brightness middle1104957 -13%913 -17%993 -10%948 -14%1117 1%Brightness1107958 -13%929 -16%997 -10%969 -12%1133 2%Brightness Distribution9797 0%96 -1%94 -3%94 -3%97 0%Black Level *Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.12.3 26%1.7 45%1.4 55%1.4 55%2.2 29%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *4.24 5%3.6 14%3.2 24%2.6 38%3.9 7%Greyscale dE 2000 *32 33%1.5 50%2.1 30%1.7 43%2.3 23%Gamma2.01 109%2.02 109%2.16 102%2.24 98%2.15 102%2.37 93%CCT6594 99%6465 101%6515 100%6796 96%6539 99%6572 99%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 HzThe display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %使用固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置进行一系列测量
我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和光度计分析了 HDR10+ 认证 AMOLED 面板的色彩校准。虽然色彩偏差在目标范围内（<3），但测得的 DeltaE 值高于同类产品。总体而言，该产品的质量非常不错，但对于这个价位的智能手机来说，校准还可以更精确一些。
色彩准确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然）--外部显示器
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然） - 外部显示器
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；轮廓：自然）--外部显示器
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然）--外部显示器
色彩准确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然）--内部显示器
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然）- 内部显示
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；轮廓：自然）--内部显示
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然）--内部显示器
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8445 ms rise↘ 0.704 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey6.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.936 ms rise↘ 3.22 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
在室外，无论显示屏如何，Fold5 都给人留下了非常好的印象，其亮度储备足以应对大多数光线环境。同样，可视角度的稳定性也非常好。
Galaxy Z Fold5 的外部显示屏
Galaxy Z Fold5 的外部显示屏
Galaxy Z Fold5 的内部显示屏
Galaxy Z Fold5 的内部显示屏
Galaxy Z Fold5 的外部显示屏
Galaxy Z Fold5 的外部显示屏
Galaxy Z Fold5 的内部显示屏
Galaxy Z Fold5 的内部显示屏性能 - 三星手机采用高通 SoC 芯片 在性能方面，三星可折叠智能手机采用了速度极快的 骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy，它在自己的基准测试中表现出色。特别是在 Geekbench 6 多核跑分中，Fold5 的性能明显高于 谷歌张量 G2的Pixel Fold.但是，其 Adreno 740，三星设备的表现也非常出色，比其前代产品高出约 30 前代产品.在 GFXBench 中，与前代产品相比，三星设备在性能上的优势在于 折叠 4在 GFXBench 中，与 Fold4 相比，性能的提升并没有体现在持续的高分上，不过，这里的原因更可能是散热问题和随之而来的节流效应。在 UL Procyon AI Inference 中出现的极低数值也令人震惊。
Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android Geekbench 6.4
Single-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1984 - 2107, n=6)
2048 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1999 Points Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1806 Points -10%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)
1618 Points -19%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1480 Points -26% Multi-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (5149 - 5652, n=6)
5408 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5384 Points Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)
4668 Points -13%Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4656 Points -14%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3533 Points -34%Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226224 Points +8%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1086936 - 1286774, n=8)
1181107 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1135554 Points Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
985150 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
973843 Points -14%Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=56, last 2 years)
847476 Points -25%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
619727 Points -45%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16311 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (15270 - 17267, n=8)
16185 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
15991 Points -2%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)
14331 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13983 Points -14%Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12606 Points -23%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11617 Points -29%CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1253 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1120 - 1332, n=8)
1239 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1178 Points -6%Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1117 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=145, last 2 years)
1047 Points -16%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
895 Points -29%BaseMark OS II
OverallSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9337 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9091 Points -3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (8541 - 9337, n=8)
8859 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7858 Points -16%Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7236 Points -23%Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=151, last 2 years)
7076 Points -24%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5704 Points -39% SystemSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14275 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14032 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12839 Points -9%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1374 - 14401, n=8)
12462 Points -11%Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12326 Points -12%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=151, last 2 years)
10868 Points -23%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
8318 Points -41% MemorySamsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9075 Points +7%Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8846 Points +4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (8467 - 9212, n=8)
8823 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8467 Points Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=151, last 2 years)
7957 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7782 Points -8%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
4556 Points -46% GraphicsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31928 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (21505 - 31928, n=8)
28672 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
28497 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=151, last 2 years)
22958 Points -28%Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20974 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19283 Points -40%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16243 Points -49% WebSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2032 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1982 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1850 Points -9%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1460 - 2032, n=8)
1768 Points -13%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1720 Points -15%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=151, last 2 years)
1637 Points -19%Huawei Mate X3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1198 Points -41%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
84787 Points +6592%Google Pixel FoldGoogle Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
37656 Points +2872%Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=142, last 2 years)
18925 Points +1394%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16511 Points +1203%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1267 - 16702, n=8)
14423 Points +1038%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1267 Points
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3892 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3791 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2766 Points -29%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2757 Points -29%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1711 Points -56%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3901 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3829 Points -2%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2821 Points -28%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2778 Points -29%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1760 Points -55%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14599 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14369 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11098 Points -24%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11041 Points -24%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6849 Points -53%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -26%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
492 fps +50%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
434 fps +32%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
329 fps Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps -8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
298 fps -9%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +29%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +28%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -3%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -11%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps +59%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
222 fps +35%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps +9%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -45%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +28%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +11%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps -1%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -23%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
190 fps +71%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +17%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -29%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +43%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +23%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -23%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -38%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps +54%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +29%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -4%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -39%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps +20%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -8%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -52%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -57%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +14%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -15%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -32%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -51%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps +26%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +9%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -34%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -55%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps +26%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
138 fps +10%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -28%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -49%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -26%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -35%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -55%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
188.652 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8)
173.4 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
159.102 Points -16%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
152.211 Points -19%Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=154, last 2 years)
142.4 Points -25%Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
106.562 Points -44%Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
103.364 Points -45%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
185 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8)
165.5 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)
145 Points -22%Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=149, last 2 years)
133.6 Points -28%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
131 Points -29%Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
101 Points -45%Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
97 Points -48%Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
60317 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
59214 Points -2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8)
59058 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
52642 Points -13%Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
50732 Points -16%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
44659 Points -26%Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
43817 Points -27%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)
1287 ms * -86%Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
1074.5 ms * -55%Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
880.8 ms * -27%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
799.9 ms * -15%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8)
795 ms * -15%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
693.3 ms * Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
685 ms * +1%* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GGoogle Pixel FoldHuawei Mate X3Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-18%-30%13%-18%34%-2% Sequential Read 256KB4384.431854.98 -58%1606.37 -63%1953.41 -55%3426.56 -22%3715 ?(3249 - 4384, n=40) -15%2158 ?(270 - 4384, n=187, last 2 years) -51% Sequential Write 256KB2449.231251.57 -49%1169.32 -52%1479.42 -40%1389.84 -43%2739 ?(555 - 3484, n=40) 12%1749 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=187, last 2 years) -29% Random Read 4KB459.94321.87 -30%219.11 -52%261.78 -43%449.77 -2%383 ?(218 - 483, n=40) -17%294 ?(47.6 - 504, n=187, last 2 years) -36% Random Write 4KB161.39265.9 65%238.72 48%466.74 189%152.92 -5%412 ?(51.8 - 730, n=40) 155%336 ?(9.4 - 964, n=187, last 2 years) 108%
排放 - 三星Galaxy Z Fold5 充电速度更快温度在闲置状态下，表面温度较低，但在连续负载情况下，我们测得的最高温度超过了 49 °C。这也反映在 3DMark Wild Life（极限）压力测试中，Fold5 的性能并不特别稳定，有时会损失初始性能的 40%。
不过，与旧版本的温度测量相比，如 Fold4相比，应该指出的是，在获取负载下的温度时，现在使用的是 Burnout 基准而不是稳定性测试。因此，无法再进行准确的比较。
Max. LoadIdle
48.6 °C47.2 °C45.3 °C 43.2 °C39.6 °C42.6 °C 33.6 °C33.6 °C33.8 °C
Maximum: 48.6 °CAverage: 40.8 °C
42.9 °C45.7 °C49.2 °C40.7 °C41.7 °C43.3 °C30.6 °C32.1 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 49.2 °CAverage: 39.8 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
26.1 °C26.1 °C25.4 °C 25.8 °C26 °C25.8 °C 26 °C26 °C26 °C
Maximum: 26.1 °CAverage: 25.9 °C
25.6 °C26 °C26.2 °C25.5 °C25.8 °C25.8 °C26 °C25.8 °C25.5 °C
Maximum: 26.2 °CAverage: 25.8 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life stress test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 % +15%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.9 % Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.6 % -11%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50.4 % -16%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40.7 % -32% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.3 % -7%Google Pixel FoldMali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.2 % -12%Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.7 % -13%Huawei Mate X3Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.9 % -35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø17.2 (15.6-23.3) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12 (10.4-16.6) Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.7 (6.38-10.8) Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11 (7.4-16.9) Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.8 (13.5-23) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.3 (50.1-83.6) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø42.2 (33.4-62.3) Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø26 (20-39.6) Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø44 (26.1-64.2) Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (53.6-77.7) Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø72.7 (55.1-86.1)
发言人 这两款扬声器的音质都很好，但中高音还可以更均衡一些。相比之下，音箱的低音和重低音都很不错。通过 USB 端口可以连接有线耳机。喜欢使用无线输出的用户可选择的编解码器不多，如 SBC、SSC、AAC、aptX 和 LDAC。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel Fold audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 4,400 毫安时的三星智能手机耗电量我们使用大尺寸主显示屏测量了 Fold5 的功耗，发现它与前代产品相当 前代产品.不过，在使用 Burnout 基准测试时，峰值功耗要高出 10 瓦多。
Fold5 的电池既可以通过内部的 25 瓦有线 "超级快速充电 "技术充电，也可以通过 15 瓦无线充电。使用合适的三星充电器（25 瓦），充满电大约需要 90 分钟。当电池电量超过 30% 时，可以使用 5 瓦的无线 PowerShare 充电。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.03 / 0.26 WattIdle 0.55 / 0.9 / 1 Watt
Load
9.58 / 10.74 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold54400 mAhSamsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G4400 mAhGoogle Pixel Fold4821 mAhHuawei Mate X34800 mAhSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultra5000 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption2%-45%-156%-1%-73%-30%Idle Minimum *0.550.89 -62%0.86 -56%0.81 -47%0.9 -64%1.531 ?(0.44 - 3.4, n=8) -178%0.868 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=159, last 2 years) -58%Idle Average *0.90.96 -7%1.7 -89%4.26 -373%1.05 -17%1.848 ?(0.69 - 3.68, n=8) -105%1.426 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=159, last 2 years) -58%Idle Maximum *11.13 -13%1.8 -80%4.45 -345%1.1 -10%1.998 ?(0.83 - 3.91, n=8) -100%1.588 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=159, last 2 years) -59%Load Average *9.584.32 55%9.1 5%10.11 -6%3.99 58%7.9 ?(3.99 - 15.8, n=8) 18%7.17 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=144, last 2 years) 25%Load Maximum *10.746.56 39%11.06 -3%11.58 -8%7.82 27%10.7 ?(6.16 - 15.9, n=8) -0%10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=144, last 2 years) -1%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.08 (1.023-13.7) Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.7 (1.089-14.7) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165) Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.81 (6.01-13.1) Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-12.7) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165) Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)
电池寿命在我们进行的实际 Wi-Fi 电池测试（使用 150 cd/m² 的自适应显示亮度）中，4,400 mAh 电池组的续航时间长达近 13 小时，这意味着它的续航时间比 Fold4 多出约 90 分钟。Fold4的续航时间长约 90 分钟。在使用较小的外置面板时，我们测得的电池续航时间为 817 分钟。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
12h 43min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold54400 mAhSamsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G4400 mAhGoogle Pixel Fold4821 mAhHuawei Mate X34800 mAhSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultra5000 mAhBattery RuntimeWiFi v1.3763663 -13%651 -15%476 -38%1100 44%
Pros+ 精美的 OLED 面板
+ 高级外壳
+ 手写笔输入
+ 长时间更新
+ 快速 SoC ...Cons- ...有节流
- 无 WiFi 7
- 重，机壳厚
- 位置问题？
- 不含充电器
结论 - 三星Galaxy Z Fold5评测：三星Galaxy Z Fold5。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。按照折叠4与可折叠智能手机的潜力和中国制造商在这一领域取得的进展相比，Galaxy Z Fold5 是一个相当温和的演变。后者的形式是Galaxy 智能手机的一个明显更轻薄的替代品，在欧洲也有销售 -Honor Magic V2。.
仔细观察，可折叠手机领域的佼佼者再次为市场带来了一款优秀的产品，并且由于其新设计的铰链，在正确的方向上迈出了一步。此外，没有其他折叠式产品能提供如此长期的更新。甚至连像素折叠屏.
在当前的折叠一代产品中，这个一次性可折叠智能手机创新者只是取得了微小的进步。随着竞争日益激烈，三星最好不要只在明年进行整合。
不幸的是，今年的设备有一种停滞不前的感觉，因为一些针对上一代产品(充电慢、外壳厚、显示屏褶皱......）并没有得到真正解决。除此之外，我们（还）希望有一种新的外形设计，因为主屏不同寻常的纵横比所带来的个性化附加值在很大程度上取决于使用习惯。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
价格和供应情况Galaxy Z Fold5（256 GB）在亚马逊暂时缺货，但512 GB 机型在同一家零售商的售价约为 1,919 美元（建议零售价）。
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
- 08/21/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis90%
Keyboard70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device96%
Connectivity69 / 70 → 98%
Weight87%
Battery90%
Display92%
Games Performance65 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature88%
Noise100%
Audio73 / 90 → 82%
Camera78%
Average84%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Galaxy Z Fold Series)News•三星内部人士： Galaxy Z Fold6 和Galaxy... |News•三星 W24 和 W24 Flip 首次亮相，配备 1 TB... |News•新的三星Galaxy Z Fold5泄漏包含完整的规格和官方... |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold5和Galaxy Z Flip... |Review•三星Galaxy Z Fold4 5G评测 - 改进的可折叠... |Review•三星Galaxy Z Fold3 5G评论。无与伦比的折叠式...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 144 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 580265 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!